|
DID
YOU KNOW.....
POINTS DEDUCTIONS, DEMOTIONS
and EXPULSIONS
Football has a million
and one stories and just as many facts and figures. Here are a few of them
- the record-breaking, unusual and bizarre. More
Did You Knows...
Index
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20
21 22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29 30
31 32
33
34
|
2022/23 |
Wigan
Athletic |
Champ |
Results |
Table |
|
|
3 points deducted
for late payment of player wages. |
|
Wigan Athletic found themselves in the
EFL dock when financial problems caused problems paying players
wages. After failing to pay players wages on time in June, July and
October in 2022 they reached an agreement with the EFL in January
2023 when they had a 3 point penalty for the failings suspended on
the understanding wages would be paid on time in the future. They
were also ordered to deposit an amount equal to 125 per cent of its
forecast monthly wage bill in a designated club account to ensure
some funds were available if cash flow caused wage payment problems
in the future. However wages were paid late in March 2023 and no
deposit account had been financed and as a result the suspension of
the 3 point penalty was overturned and the points were deducted.
Wigan were relegated at the end of the season but would have
suffered the same fate even without the points deduction.
|
2022/23 |
Reading |
Champ |
Results |
Table |
|
|
6 points deducted
for late payment of player wages. |
|
Reading suffered a 6 point deduction in
2021/22 (see below) as a result of financial problems with another 6
point deduction being suspended on the understanding that Reading
stuck to a business plan in the months ahead. But in April 2023 they
were guilty of not fully following the plan and the suspension of
the points penalty was overturned and the 6 point penalty was
applied. The loss of those points saw Reading relegated at the
season end.
|
2021/22 |
Reading |
Champ |
Results |
Table |
|
|
6 points deducted
for breaching financial rules. |
|
Shortly after Derby received their 9
point penalty (see below) it was the turn of Reading to found guilty
of breaching EFL financial rules. Because of overspending the
Championship club had been under a transfer embargo since the summer
but with the EFL stating that the club had lost £57.8
million between 2017 and 2021 - the maximum loss in that period
should have been £39m - it was a points deduction this time. Six
points were immediately deducted from their points total - leaving
them just above the relegation zone - with another six point
deduction hanging over them until the end of 2022/23 if they failed
to comply with an agreed business plan. They finished the season
four points and one place above a relegation position.
|
2021/22 |
Derby
County |
Champ |
Results |
Table |
|
|
12 points deducted
for entering administration and a 9 point deduction for breaching
financial rules. |
|
It came as no shock when
financially
troubled Derby County finally called in the administrators on
September 22nd 2021 which resulted in an immediate 12 point penalty.
Club owner Mel Morris said that owning the club had cost him
personally over £200 million with the coronavirus pandemic costing
the club itself over £20 million. The deduction took the Rams to
the foot of the table and they also faced the possibility of another
9 point deduction for breaching financial rules relating to the
valuation of their Pride Park ground. Sadly for the Rams that
further 9 point penalty was imposed in November 2021 and at the same time
the hoped-for appeal against the earlier 12 point penalty was
dismissed. That left Derby on -3 points in the Championship table
with relegation looking a certainty and indeed that is what happened
with the Rams finishing the campaign just one place above the bottom
spot.
|
2020/21 |
Sheffield
Wednesday |
Champ |
Results |
Table |
|
|
6 points deducted
for breach of financial fair play rules. |
|
On July 31st 2020 it was announced that Sheffield Wednesday had been
docked 12 points - later reduced on appeal to 6 points - for a breach of profitability and financial
sustainability rules. Under those rules Championship clubs were not
allowed to post losses of over £39m over a three year period.
Wednesday had posted losses of £9.8m, £20.8m and would have had a
loss of £35.8m for the third year had they not included the profit
from the sale of their Hillsborough ground which turned the
substantial loss into a £2.5m profit. But there were problems which
brought Wednesday to the disciplinary panel - the ground was
sold to the owner of the club and hadn't been sold in the period for
which the profit was declared. Them's the facts which saw Sheffield
Wednesday suffer the 12 point penalty but those points weren't to be
taken off Wednesday's 2019/20 points total but carried forward to the
2020/21 season. There was a great debate in the press and amongst fans
about the injustice of that decision. The 2019/20 season had only
finished a little over a week before the punishment was handed out,
the original charge had been made in November 2019 while the
overspending which Sheffield Wednesday had been guilty of - and which
they had unfairly benefited from with regards to paying higher wages
etc - had taken place over the previous 3 years. Had the punishment
been applied in 2019/20 with the original 12 point penalty Sheffield Wednesday would have been relegated
from the Championship while Charlton would have been saved from the
drop. OK, seeing clubs relegated because of a breach of rules is a tad
sad but looking back at the other points deductions since the start of
2019/20 - which saw Bolton relegated, Wigan relegated, Bury losing
their League place and Macclesfield being relegated from the League -
Sheffield Wednesday's punishment seemed to be lacking the same level
of justice!
|
2019/20 |
Wigan
Athletic |
Champ |
Results |
Table |
|
|
12 points deducted
for entering administration. |
|
Not anyone can own a Premier League or EFL club with the football
authorities having a 'fit and proper' test to see if potential owners
are worthy of that particular honour. Sadly that test doesn't always
seem to work. At the start of the 2019/20 season Wigan Athletic
were owned by a company based in Hong Kong, the International
Entertainment Corporation. On June 4th 2020 a change of ownership was
completed with the new owners being Next Leader Fund who were also
based in Hong Kong but registered in the Caymen Islands. Less than a
month later, on 1st July 2020, Wigan became the first league side to
be put into administration after the start of the coronavirus
pandemic. The standard 12 point penalty was applied which saw the
Latics drop into the bottom three of the Championship and suffer
relegation. Their was much speculation in the press - and amongst
fans! - as to why anyone would buy a club and then see them enter
administration less than a month later. 'Shadowy' was a much used
description of the owners and there was even speculation that the
adminstrators were called in to see Wigan lose 12 points as there had
been some hefty bets made in the Far East on Wigan being relegated.
Whatever the truth, the overwhelming conclusion was the footballing
authorities need to be a little more thorough in vetting potential new
owners of our football clubs.
|
2019/20 |
Macclesfield
Town |
League 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
17 points deducted
for various breaches of rules. |
|
Following on from Bolton and Bury sadly Macclesfield Town became the
third club from the north-west to suffer serious financial problems in
2019/20. Continuing problems with paying staff on time - both players
and non-playing staff - saw the first team go on strike for their FA
Cup tie with Kingstonian on November 10th 2019. Macclesfield fielded a
team of youth players and loanees - and lost 4-0. Worse was to follow
though on December 7th when their League 2 match against Crewe was
postponed because of another players strike while a fortnight later
their next home match v Plymouth was called off when their Local
Safety Group banned any spectators from attending the match because of
the lack of crowd safety staff. Macclesfield were docked 11 points for
the two postponements and then in June another 2 points were lost as a result
of not paying staff in March with a further four point penalty being
suspended. The 13 points they lost almost saw them
loose their place in the League - they finished just one point and one
place above relegated Stevenage. Or so they thought! On August 11th
2020 an appeals tribunal declared that the four point suspended
penalty from June should in fact be applied to the 2019/20 season
which saw Stevenage reprieved from relegation with Macclesfield being
relegated. Full
details.
|
2019/20 |
Bolton
Wanderers |
League 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
12 points deducted
for entering administration. |
|
The 2018/19 season had
been a diabolical one for Bolton Wanderers. Heavily in debt -
including an unpaid £1.2 million bill from the taxman - and not
paying the staff wages a food bank for staff was set up at the ground
and the players went on strike forcing the postponement of their match
against Brentford scheduled for April 27th 2019 (that match was never
played - see postponements).
And they were relegated! Shortly after that relegation was confirmed
the club went into administration resulting in Bolton starting the
2019/20 season with minus 12 points to their name in the League 1 table.
|
2019/20 |
Bury |
League 1 |
Fixture
List |
|
|
|
12 points deducted
for arranging a CVA with creditors, followed by expulsion from the
League. |
|
Unlike their near
neighbours Bolton (see above) Bury had a successful season on the
pitch in 2018/19 gaining promotion to League 1 after finishing in
second spot in League 2. Off the pitch, however, their finances were
in a terrible state with the PFA having to pay the players' wages in
March and April and fans donating shopping vouchers to the unpaid
staff. Although Bury didn't go into administration they agreed a
Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) with their creditors which the
Football League deemed to be an 'insolvency event' and so they started
the 2019/20 season with minus 12 points to their name. Sadly worse was
to follow. The League required Bury to provide them with proof that
the club could pay their creditors and be viable financially during
the new season. This they couldn't do to the League's satisfaction and
so Bury had their first six League and Cup matches 'suspended'
(postponed) before their membership of the Football League was
suspended on 27th August 2019.
|
2018/19 |
Birmingham
City |
Champ |
Results |
Table |
|
|
9 points deducted
for a breach of financial rules. |
|
In
March 2019 Birmingham City
became the first club to fall foul of
the profitability and sustainability rules introduced by the Football
League at the start of the 2016/17 season. They suffered a nine point
deduction as a result. The rules stated that over any three year
period no club should lose more than £39 million. Birmingham almost
managed to do that in one year when they announced a loss of £37.5m
for the year to the end of June 2018 but added to the loses of the
previous two years the total loss was a rule-breaking - and
eye-watering - £48.8m. Much of the blame was aimed at managers
Gianfranco Zola and Harry Redknapp. Although they were only at St
Andrews for nine months in total in 2016 and 2017 they managed
to spend over £31m in transfer fees for new players, Added to that
came the considerable extra cost of paying those new players and then
the costs involved in sacking both managers!
|
2018/19 |
Brentford |
Champ |
Results |
Table |
|
|
3
points added when fixture v Bolton went unplayed. |
|
Bolton had a terrible 2018/19
season dominated by financial problems and relegation. Unpaid wages
saw the Bolton players take strike action which resulted in their home
Championship match against Brentford on Saturday April 27th 2019 being
postponed. The fixture was re-arranged for Tuesday May 7th but with
that being after the scheduled end of the season and with the Bolton
security staff threatening their own strike action the Football League
cancelled the meeting and awarded the three points to Brentford with a
nominal 1-0 victory. It was only the second time in the history of the
League that the season had finished with an unplayed match - the
previous case being the Division 4 fixture between Scunthorpe and
Exeter in 1973/74. Full
Story of both unplayed matches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014/15 |
Rotherham United |
Champ |
Results |
Table |
|
|
3 points deducted
for fielding an ineligible player. |
|
Rotherham United suffered
a points
deduction for the fourth time after the Football League
found them guilty of fielding an ineligible player. The club played
defender Farrend Rawson for the whole 90 minutes of their 1-0 home
Championship victory over Brighton on April 6th 1995 despite his 28
day loan period from Derby having ended the day before. They also
suffered a £30,000 fine, half of which was suspended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013/14 |
Coventry
City |
League 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points deducted
after failing to reach an agreement to emerge from administration with
a Company Voluntary Agreement. |
|
Coventry's problems continued.
The bad news was after being docked 10 points in 2012/13 for entering
administration they started the new season with another 10 point
deduction when they couldn't agree a CVA with their creditors and went
into liquidation. The good news was that the Football League permitted
a transfer of club ownership which allowed them to continue as a
League club and that it was only a 10 point deduction - it could have
been more. The really bad news was that the creditor they had the
biggest problem with - Arena Coventry Limited - was the owner of their
Ricoh Arena home and the fall-out with them saw Coventry City having
to relocate to Northampton, 35 miles away. Their first League 'home'
match at Northampton Town's Sixfields Stadium - against Bristol City
on Sunday August 11th 2013 - attracted an attendance of just 2204. |
|
|
|
|
|
2013/14 |
AFC
Wimbledon |
League 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
3 points deducted
for fielding an ineligible player. |
|
Jake Nicholson came on a sub for the
start of the second half for AFC Wimbledon's home game with Cheltenham
Town on Saturday 22nd March 2014 and scored a goal in the 4-3 victory.
Nicholson had joined Wimbledon from Morton on a renewable monthly
contract and his first month ended on March 19th. Unfortunately a bout
of illness at the club meant that officials overlooked extending the
contract on March 20th and so when he played two days later he was
unregistered and so ineligible to play. |
|
|
|
2012/13 |
Coventry
City |
League 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points deducted after entering
administration |
|
|
|
2012/13 |
Portsmouth |
League 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points deducted
after leaving administration with a Company Voluntary Arrangement not
fully compliant with the Football League's insolvency policy. |
|
So
Portsmouth's misery was complete. In 2010 they played in the FA Cup
Final as a Premier League side and in 2013 they will be in League 2
thanks to a three point deduction and three relegations in four
seasons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012/13 |
Aldershot
Town |
League 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points deducted
after entering administration |
|
Just days after
Aldershot Town had played their last match of the 2012/13 season, a
2-0 defeat at Rotherham United which saw them finish bottom of the
League 2 table and so relegated from the Football League, the club
went into administration. They suffered the standard points deduction
but those 10 points were taken off their points total at the start of
the 2013/14 season when they kicked off in the Conference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011/12 |
Portsmouth |
Champ |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points deducted after entering
administration |
|
|
|
2011/12 |
Port
Vale |
League 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points deducted after entering
administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010/11 |
Plymouth Argyle |
League 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points deducted after entering
administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010/11 |
Hereford United |
League 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
3 points deducted for fielding an
ineligible player
|
2010/11 |
Torquay United |
League 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
1 point deducted for fielding an
ineligible player |
|
When Torquay met Hereford in a
League 2 match on Tuesday 1st February 2011 points were vital for both clubs but
the end result was minus one point from the match. The visitors won 3-1 but
both clubs fielded ineligible players - Jake Robinson for Torquay and
Rob Purdie for Hereford. Both played for the full 90 minutes - Robinson scored
for Torquay - but although both players had signed for their clubs the
previous day - transfer deadline day - neither signing had been registered
with the Football League by the midnight deadline. Hereford were docked the
3 points they had won and Torquay had one point deducted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/10 |
Portsmouth |
Premier |
Results |
Table |
|
|
9 points deducted after entering
administration
(the first Premier Leaguer side to suffer this penalty) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/10 |
Crystal Palace |
Champ |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points
deducted after entering administration |
|
With Palace
reputedly £30 million in debt and finding it difficult to pay players'
wages the Londoners entered administration in January 2010, followed
swiftly by a 10 point penalty. That saw them sink from the edge of the
play-off area to the edge of the Championship relegation area but
administration also has another damaging consequence - players need to
be sold to raise cash. Of course the best players raise the most cash
and so Victor Moses made an immediate move to Wigan for £2.5 million.
As a consequence of the problems only an away draw at Sheffield
Wednesday on the last day of the season saved them from relegation
(although the draw saw Wednesday relegated).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/10 |
Hartlepool United |
League 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
3 points
deducted for fielding an ineligible player |
|
Hartlepool had three points
deducted for fielding an ineligible player. Gary Liddle played for
them in their 2-0 home victory over Brighton on 5th April 2010 when he should
have been sitting out the first of a two-match suspension after picking up
his 10th booking of the season in United's previous game. Hartlepool
lost the three points earned against Brighton and also suffered a
suspended fine of £10,000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/10 |
Southampton |
League 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points
deducted after entering administration |
|
Although Southampton's holding
company, Southampton Leisure Holdings plc, went into administration in
April 2009 Southampton FC argued that it shouldn't have received a
points penalty as the football club itself wasn't in administration.
The argument failed as the Football League considered the football
club and its holding company were 'inextricably linked as one economic
entity'. So the Saints received a 10 points penalty at the end of the
2008/09 season but as they were relegated from the Championship
without that punishment the deduction was carried forward a season and Southampton
started 2009/10 on minus 10 points. But for that deduction they would
have been promoted from League 1 in 2009/10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008/09 |
Stockport County |
League 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points
deducted after entering administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008/09 |
Darlington |
League 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points
deducted after entering administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008/09 |
Bournemouth |
League 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
17 points deducted for breach of insolvency rules |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008/09 |
Luton
Town |
League 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
30 points deducted for breach of
insolvency rules and misconduct |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008/09 |
Rotherham United |
League 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
17 points deducted for breach of insolvency rules |
|
Bournemouth,
Luton and Rotherham were found guilty of breaching the Football
League's insolvency policy by failing to exit administration with a
Company Voluntary Agreement - CVA. Bournemouth and Rotherham each had
17 points docked and Luton lost 20 points (the differing punishments
taking account of each clubs' past financial misdemeanours). Luton had 10 another points deducted after being found guilty by the
Football Association of 15 charges of misconduct concerning payments
to agents by irregular means. With all three clubs suffering the
deductions at the start of the season it gave an unusual look to the
early-season table, the bottom of the League 2 table after a couple of
matches being shown above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007/08 |
Bournemouth |
League 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points
deducted after entering administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007/08 |
Leeds
United |
League 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
15
points deducted for breach of financial rules |
|
After suffering a 10 point deduction
in 2006/07 for entering administration Leeds started the 2007/08
season with a 15 point penalty for leaving administration without a
Company Voluntary Agreement. A CVA is an agreement an insolvent company
has with its creditors about what will be repaid and when. A CVA is
a Football League requirement for a club exiting insolvency and without
it Leeds became the first club to suffer the penalty of a 15 point
deduction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007/08 |
Luton
Town |
League 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points
deducted after entering administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007/08 |
Rotherham United |
League 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points
deducted after entering administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006/07 |
Leeds
United |
Champ |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points
deducted after entering administration |
|
|
Just 6 seasons
after they were Champions League semi-finalists! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006/07 |
Rotherham United |
League 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points
deducted after entering administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006/07 |
Boston
United |
League 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points
deducted after entering administration |
|
At the end of the season a loophole
in the administration rules which saw clubs manipulate the timing of
entering administration was closed. Leeds went into administration
just before their final match of the season when they were doomed to
relegation. Boston United were even more blatant. Going into their
last match they still had a chance to avoid relegation from the
Football League but when defeat at Wrexham looked inevitable they went
into administration before the final whistle went. With both
clubs going down anyway the 10-point penalty for going into
administration was no real punishment - but if they had waited to go
into admin after the season finished the points deduction would have
applied at the start of the following season, a far greater
punishment. At their AGM the 72 Football League Chairman voted
unanimously to change the rules. From then on any club going into
administration after the fourth Thursday in March had the ten point
deduction suspended until it was known whether the punishment would
have a 'material effect'. If a club was outside the relegation area
before the points deduction was made then the 10 point penalty would
be made during that season (and they might suffer a forced
relegation). If they were going down anyway the points deduction would
apply at the start of the following season.
|
|
|
|
2004/05 |
Wrexham |
League 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points
deducted after entering administration |
|
For the start of the 2004/05 season
both the Premier League and Football League passed new rules for clubs
entering administration after suffering financial problems. Apart from
showing poor financial control entering administration was seen as a
way of manipulating insolvency rules by shredding debt and then
carrying on borrowing on the same scale as before. Some 33 clubs over
the previous 20 or so seasons had entered administration but from
now on those doing it would suffer a footballing penalty - a 10-point deduction
for Football League clubs and 9 points for Premier League clubs (they
play fewer matches). In December 2004 Wrexham entered administration
with debts of about £2.5million and so became the first
club to suffer such a penalty, being relegated as a result.
|
|
|
|
2004/05 |
Cambridge United |
League 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
10 points
deducted after entering administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002/03 |
Boston
United |
Division 3 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
4 points deducted for financial
irregularities |
|
Boston United's pleasure in playing
their first season in the Football League was diminished a tad by
starting the campaign with minus four points to their name. While in
the Conference the Lincolnshire club, their manager Steve Evans and
former chairman Pat Malkinson faced a total of 16 FA charges relating
to financial irregularities. The club were found guilty of the six
charges they faced, relating to irregularities in the contracts with
players Paul Bastock, Ken Charlery, Jim Dick, Paul Wilson, Simon
Weatherstone and Mike Marsh. Contract details given to the FA bore no
relation to what the club were paying the players - for example the
contract with former Liverpool and West Ham player Marsh stated a
salary of £100 a week when he actually received £1000 a week. Boston
were fined £100,000 and docked four points from the start of the new
season. While the club unsuccessfully appealed against the severity of
the sentence many thought Boston got away lightly believing as the
offences occurred when they were a Conference side the punishment
should be as a Conference side. Most vocal were Conference runners-up
Dagenham & Redbridge - had Boston had the four points deducted in
their championship-winning Conference season Dagenham would have been
champions and promoted to the Football League and Boston would have
finished second.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000/01 |
Chesterfield |
Division 3 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
9 points deducted for financial
irregularities |
|
A Guardian reporter summed up Darren
Brown's ownership of Chesterfield thus - he 'emptied the club of cash
and drove it to the edge of ruin in a few hair-raising months'.
Chesterfield's dodgy finances came to the attention of the FA and
Football League who looked into every aspect of the clubs' finances
although they were found guilty of only two. These related to
irregularities in the transfer of Luke Beckett from Chester to
Chesterfield (Chester hadn't been paid!) and the under-reporting of
gate receipts. Although there was a move to expel Chesterfield from
the Football League in the end it was a 9 point deduction.
Chesterfield were still promoted, Darren Brown later ended up in
prison, and the Football League introduced a 'fit and proper' person
test for club owners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1997/98 |
Leyton
Orient |
Division 3 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
3 points deducted for the fielding
suspended players |
|
Club secretary David Burton failed
to keep up with details of players who had been booked resulting in
three players - Mark Warren, Simon Clark and Stuart Hicks - playing in
matches when they should have been suspended. The O's received a
£20,000 FA fine (£12,500 of it suspended) but were then hit with a 3
point deduction from the Football League. Burton accepted full
responsibility and resigned as club secretary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996/97 |
Middlesbrough |
Premier |
Results |
Table |
|
|
3 points deducted for the unauthorised
postponing of a match |
|
Middlesbrough were due to play at
Blackburn in December but manager Bryan Robson claimed he was unable
to field a competitive team as they had 23 players unavailable because
of injury, illness or suspension. Middlesbrough postponed the match -
but without the permission of the Premier League. As a result they
were fined £50,000 and were docked three points, the loss of points
seeing them relegated at the season's end. Full story -
postponed matches. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996/97 |
Brighton
& Hove Albion |
Division 3 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
2 points deducted for pitch invasions |
|
When Brighton fans, protesting at
the proposed move from their Goldstone ground home, invaded the pitch
for the match against York City on Saturday April 27th 1996 they
forced the abandonment of the match. The club suffered a suspended
three point penalty. In 1996/97 Brighton fans again protested with a
pitch invasion in the match against Lincoln City on Tuesday 1st
October 1996 and were punished with losing two of the three points
from that suspended sentence. It almost cost them a place in the
Football League -
full story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992/93 |
Maidstone United |
Division 3 |
Fixtures |
Table |
|
|
Maidstone United resigned from the
Football League |
|
Just five moths after Aldershot
resigned from the League financial problems forced Maidstone United to
quit the competition as well. Their opening-day fixture at Scunthorpe
on Saturday August 15th 1992 was postponed because of those financial
problems and the Football League gave them to the following Monday to
make guarantees that they could complete their fixtures. This they
couldn't do so on Monday 17th August they resigned from the Football
League.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1991/92 |
Aldershot |
Division 4 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
Aldershot resigned from the Football
League |
|
Aldershot's
financial plight was no secret and many considered it a miracle that
they managed to survive until March 1992. A succession of people with
plenty of ideas but not so much money came and went at the Recreation
including 19-year-old 'property developer' Spencer Trethewy who became
a director after promising the earth. He lasted just three months before
being exposed as skint himself. Aldershot's last match in the Football
League was a 2-0 defeat at Cardiff City on Friday March 20th 1992 and
five days later they had to resign from the Football League after
being declared bankrupt. So they became the first club since
Accrington Stanley, almost exactly 30 years earlier, the leave the
League before the end of the season. The 36 League matches they had
played were declared void.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1990/91 |
Arsenal |
Division 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
2 points deducted for bringing the game
into disrepute |
1990/91 |
Manchester United |
Division 1 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
1 point deducted for bringing the game
into disrepute |
|
I
don't think that you would ever get bored at a match between
Manchester United and Arsenal and that was certainly true when the two
sides met at Old Trafford in a First Division match on October 20th
1990. The 'Battle of Old Trafford' - or is that one of many 'Battles
of Old Trafford!' - erupted when a clash between Arsenal's Nigel
Winterburn and United's Brian McClair developed into a full-scale
brawl involving 21 players, only Arsenal's 'keeper David Seaman
watching on. As a result both clubs were charged with, and found
guilty of, bringing the game into disrepute. Manchester United were
docked one point and Arsenal - because they had been involved in a
similar brawl the previous season against Norwich - lost two points. |
|
|
1989/90 |
Swindon
Town |
Division 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
Swindon Town were denied a place in the
First Division |
|
After
having beaten Sunderland in the play-off final to win promotion to the
First Division for the first time Swindon admitted at a Football
League hearing 36 breaches of League rules. Initially their punishment
was relegation to the Third Division although on appeal that was
reduced to relegation back to the Second Division. Sunderland were
promoted to the top flight in their place.
Full story. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1987/88 |
Halifax
Town |
Division 4 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
1 point deducted for fielding an
unregistered player |
|
|
|
1987/88 |
Tranmere
Rovers |
Division 4 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
2 points deducted for not fulfilling a
fixture |
|
Hard-up
Tranmere objected to the amount of policing they were required to have
- and pay for - for their League match at Prenton Park on Tuesday
September 24th 1987 against Bolton, the most local of their derbies.
An appeal to the police and the courts proved unsuccessful and
although the courts gave permission for the match to be played behind
closed doors this Tranmere declined to do, postponing the match instead. A
Football League disciplinary committee fined Tranmere £2000 and
deducted 2 points from their total for the unauthorised postponement |
|
|
1982/83 |
Blackpool |
Division 4 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
2 points deducted for fielding an
ineligible player |
|
After signing John Butler at the start of the 1982/83 season
Blackpool played him in two Division 4 matches and a League Cup tie
before his registration had been approved by the Football League.
Blackpool claimed that they had immediately sent the relevant forms
but they had been delayed in the post. Ironically the club were the
closest to the Football League's Lytham St Annes HQ, just three miles
away, and John Butler only ever made four League starts in his whole
career. The two points lost by Blackpool put them into a League
re-election position at the end of the season. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1981/82 |
Bristol
Rovers |
Division 3 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
2 points deducted for fielding an
unregistered player |
|
By missing
the registration deadline for upgrading apprentices to full
professionals Bristol Rovers were guilty of fielding an unregistered
player, Steve Bailey, in their 1-1 draw at Newport County on 16th
March 1982. They were deducted 2 points. |
|
|
1981/82 |
Mansfield Town |
Division 4 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
2 points deducted for fielding an
unregistered player |
|
For the same
reason as Bristol Rovers (above), Mansfield Town were found guilty of fielding
an unregistered player, Colin Calderwood, who was making his League
debut in their match at Crewe on 13th March 1982. They also had 2
points deducted but as they had won 2-0 at Crewe the one point they
were left with from that match was enough to keep them above Rochdale
and prevent them needing to seek re-election.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1974/75 |
Aldershot |
Division 3 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
1 point deducted for fielding an
ineligible player |
|
John Sainty's debut as
substitute for Aldershot at Hereford United on August 17th, the
opening day of the 1974/75 season, was memorable for the wrong reason.
He hadn't been registered with the League so Aldershot were fined and
suffered a one point deduction. Aldershot lost the match 2-0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973/74 |
Preston
North End |
Division 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
1 point deducted for fielding an
ineligible player |
|
Dave Carrick
made a substitute appearance for Preston at Oxford United on November
17th 1973 after having signed the same week from non-leaguers Witton
Albion. However his registration hadn't been endorsed by the Football
League at the time of his Preston debut against Oxford.
|
|
|
1973/74 |
Newport
County |
Division 4 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
1 point deducted for fielding an
ineligible player |
|
When David
Jenkins moved on loan from Hereford to Newport County in March 1974 he
went on to play only 6 League matches for Somerton Park club - and was
substituted in half of them. But when he made his debut for The
Ironsides away to Peterborough on Saturday March 9th, a 0-2 defeat,
his registration hadn't been completed and Newport were docked one
point by the Football League for fielding an ineligible player.
|
|
|
|
1973/74 |
Scunthorpe United |
Division 4 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
2 points added when opponents
Exeter refused to play them |
|
Well hardly a
points deduction but I think worthy of a mention in this section.
Exeter called off - without League permission - their scheduled
Division 4 fixture at Scunthorpe because nine of their players were
unwell or injured - and had medical certificates to prove it - leaving
the club with just nine fit players. Two of those nine were
goalkeepers but the Devon club were still charged with failing to
fulfil a fixture. They were fined and ordered
to compensate Scunthorpe for lost gate receipts but the match was not
ordered to be played with Scunthorpe being awarded the two points. It
was the first time in Football League history that a match was never
played and has only been repeated once more - that match being the
Bolton v Brentford League 1 fixture in 2018/19. Full
Story of both unplayed matches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1967/68 |
Peterborough United |
Division 3 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
Peterborough were demoted to the 4th
Division |
|
Peterborough
were demoted from Division 3 to Division 4 after being found guilty of
financial irregularities. It is one of the harshest penalties in
League history - they were told of the punishment in November so had
to play the majority of the season knowing however well they did they
would still be relegated. Full story -
Posh Miscellany.
|
|
|
1967/68 |
Port
Vale |
Division 4 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
Port Vale were expelled from the Football
League |
|
Like
Peterborough, Port Vale were found guilty of financial irregularities
and like Peterborough received a harsh sentence - expulsion from the
Football League at the end of the season. But in reality it wasn't
that bad - at the League AGM they were voted straight back into the
League, 40 votes for and 9 against.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1961/62 |
Accrington Stanley |
Division 4 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
Accrington Stanley resigned from the Football
League |
|
Accrington
Stanley became only the second club to resign from the Football League
without completing their fixtures. Their last match was on Friday 2nd
March 1962 at Crewe Alexandra - they lost 0-4 in a snow-storm. The
following week a creditors' meeting was held but with debts
approaching £60,000 it was almost impossible to find even £400 to pay
the electricity, gas, water and telephone bills. A letter of
resignation was sent to the Football League and although a week later
another letter was sent changing their mind their resignation had been
accepted. The 33 League matches they had played - from which they had
taken 18 points - were declared void and deleted from the records. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1931/32 |
Wigan
Borough |
Division 3N |
Results |
Table |
|
|
Wigan Borough resigned from the Football
League |
|
Wigan Borough
resigned from the Football League on October 26th 1931 due to
financial problems. They had played 12 League matches but their
playing record was declared void.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1926/27 |
Stockport County |
Division 3N |
Results |
Table |
|
|
2 points deducted for fielding an
ineligible player |
|
Joe Smith was a sensational signing for Stockport County. A legend at
Bolton, the five-time England international signed for County on March
17th 1927 and when he made his debut two days later a then Edgeley
Park record crowd of 22,622 witnessed him play his part in the 2-2
draw with Stoke City. Sadly though when that match was played the
Football League hadn't received his registration. Stockport were found
guilty of fielding an unregistered player and were fined £100, had two
points docked and for the remainder of the season Smith was banned
from playing against opponents who had a chance of finishing in
promotion or re-election positions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1919/20 |
Leeds
City |
Division 2 |
Results |
Table |
|
|
Leeds City were expelled from the Football
League |
|
Leeds City
were expelled from the Football League after 8 matches and their
fixtures were taken over by Burslem Port Vale.
Full
story,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1890/91 |
Sunderland |
League |
Results |
Table |
|
|
2 points deducted for fielding an
ineligible player |
|
Goalkeeper Teddy Doig made his debut for Sunderland at WBA on
September 20th 1890 and soon established himself as a leading player
in Sunderland's 'Team of all the Talents' which was set to dominate
the English football scene. But his debut was not remembered so much
for his part in Sunderland's 4-0 victory but for the fact that he
shouldn't have played! The Scotsman had been previously signed up by
Blackburn - his one game for them was a 9-1 League victory over Notts
County in November 1889 - but for his Sunderland registration to be
valid the League needed seven-days notice before playing his first
match. It seems the letter was delayed in the post and Doig's debut
was before the registration period was complete and as a result
Sunderland became the first League club to suffer a points deduction,
two points being knocked off their total.
|
1889/90 |
Notts County |
League |
Results |
Table |
|
|
1 point deducted for fielding an
ineligible player - this penalty was later overturned on appeal |
|
The second season
of the Football League saw the Management Committee impose a
points penalty for the first time with Notts County fielding an
ineligible player against Aston Villa on November 9th 1889. County had
found themselves a player short for the Villa match and so borrowed a
player from their near neighbours, non-leaguers Nottingham Forest. The
match ended 1-1 at Trent Bridge but Villa successfully argued that the
borrowed player wasn't registered to play for Notts County and so was
ineligible. The League Management Committee upheld that complaint
docking Notts County one point and fining them £5. The player Notts
County borrowed was Tinsley Lindley who was a remarkable character. As
a 16-year old he scored a hat-trick on his debut for Nottingham Forest
and later scored 14 goals in 13 appearances for England. He wore
walking shoes rather than traditional football boots as he could run
quicker in them and remained an amateur player throughout his playing
career. He also played County cricket for Nottinghamshire. He also
studied law at Cambridge University and was a barrister and in that
capacity took charge of County's appeal against the punishment
claiming that by imposing both a fine and a points penalty Notts
County had been punished twice. A General Meeting of the League clubs
accepted his argument dropping the one point deduction but increasing
the fine to a whopping £25. |
|